Felthouse V Bindley
- Failing to see i to i over the value of an old mobile I wanted to recycle
- Barrister Richard Colbey pointed us to the case of Felthouse v Bindley (1862) that established the rule that “silence cannot amount to acceptance” in a contract.
- Renewal rip-offs: don't roll over
- Surely there must also be some act on the part of the the offeree to indicate acceptance of a contract, see Felthouse v Bindley 1862.
Felthouse V Bindley is described in multiple online sources, as addition to our editors' articles, see section below for printable documents, Felthouse V Bindley books and related discussion.
Suggested News Resources
Great care has been taken to prepare the information on this page. Elements of the content come from factual and lexical knowledge databases, realmagick.com library and third-party sources. We appreciate your suggestions and comments on further improvements of the site.
Felthouse V Bindley Topics
Related searchesdisjunct distribution
massacre of the innocents
fan death what the experts say
shortwave unusual signals