Grutter V Bollinger Dissent
- A son of Queens leaves unique legal legacy
- Scalia was also among the minority in Grutter v Bollinger, a 2003 landmark case upholding affirmative action in the admissions policy at the University of Michigan Law School. He was one of only two dissenting members in the 2004 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case ...
- COMMENTARY: Both parties to blame for debate on vacancy
- The editorial board also addresses his concurring opinion in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, where the full text is, “I adhere to the view I expressed in Grutter v.
- Scalia Was Reliable Friend to Texas Conservatives
- Scalia, a longtime opponent of affirmative action, was almost certain to vote against UT-Austin. He was in the dissent in Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003, when the Supreme Court upheld the practice of affirmative action in a limited way.
- Round Two on Affirmative Action in 'Fisher' Case
- In response to Fisher's original complaint in the federal district court, UT argued that its program was following the holding of a major Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S.
Grutter V Bollinger Dissent is described in multiple online sources, as addition to our editors' articles, see section below for printable documents, Grutter V Bollinger Dissent books and related discussion.
Suggested News Resources
Grutter V Bollinger Dissent Topics
Related searchesarabic grammar inflection
netaji subhas institute of technology
gideon v wainwright decision
laughing owl distribution
abdul-qasim junaid baghdadi